Marketing with Video and Rich Media Blog

Barclay’s new video does great job of positioning the bank.

Barclays’ new video delivers what advertisers strive for but so few are able to deliver:

The video has a simple but powerful message, it is memorable and it is very well produced.  Sure,  when you’re the worlds fourth largest financial institution you can afford to invest in quality, but spending money is no guarantee of success. Barclay’s does a great job of positioning itself against the current backdrop of global uncertainty as a pillar of strength, a place to turn that isn’t a house of cards or a financial facade.

Is it true?

Who knows? They bought Lehman Brothers last September and inherited a ridiculous amount of debt. China and Qatar now own (and control) a big piece of the company. But it’s advertising we’re talking about here – it’s perceptions that matter. This ad delivers a very convincing message – Barclay’s is un-fake, it’s solid, it’s there when you need it – when everything else around you seems to be falling apart. That’s  a powerful message.

The production values are incredible. It feels more like a movie than an ad and it manages to build your interest right up until the big payoff at the end. I doubt it will make big viral numbers and it won’t have the same impact if it is cut down to 30 seconds. This would be a great ad to run at movie theatres.  (I hate movie theatre ads too… unless they are really good.)

If Barclay’s reality matches the perceptions delivered in this ad then they are in good shape. If not, they’ve still done a great job at positioning themselves in a turbulent financial marketplace.

t-mobile creates another viral ‘event’.

A few months a go it was a flash mob dancing in Liverpool station. This time around it’s a sing-along in Trafalgar Square.

T-Mobile continues to embrace event-based promotions to support their Life’s for Sharing  marketing campaign. It’s working well for them. T-Mobile enticed a large crowd (mob) to gather in Trafalgar square to take part in a massive ‘dance activity’ -  like the Liverpool stunt, but bigger. Instead of dancing (selected) people were handed microphones and the mob was encouraged to belt out a fourteen thousand strong version of Hey Jude. Multiple cameras throughout the audience captured the love.

The video makes you smile and I have to imagine that Sir Paul approves (legally or otherwise). While it is different in structure from the Liverpool Station video it is similar enough in approach that I don’t believe it will create quite the same buzz this time around. It’s still better than most viral videos in that it directly and obviously supports a specific market positioning – ‘Lifes for Sharing’, it is very well done and it is very engaging (very shareable). I imagine T-Mobile will  be back at it in a few months with something even ‘newer and fresher.’

The back-story around these events is almost as important as the events themselves. Pink was in the crowd to perform a few songs and to work the crowd into a performance-ready pitch. There are as many “I was this close to Pink” camera phone videos as there are “This is me taking part in the song” videos on YouTube. This participatory approach is very smart as it promotes viral and social engagement .

It’s interesting to wade through the criticism of these types of events: “It’s fake”, “It’s staged”, “It’s just a big ad for T-Mobile”. Sure it is, so what? All those people and cameras… and Pink…  didn’t show up on their own. One blogger commented that she refused payment to promote the event on her blog and was torn about even mentioning the video. I’m surprised that people still don’t realize that video seeding and PR and a million other promotional activities are an integral (essential) part of the ‘viral’ success of these videos.

Are viral videos just sponsored entertainment?

 

Who would bother forwarding an infomercial on to a friend?

Millions of people as it turns out. The above video is a rap remix of the original Slap Chop video that already has 1.4 million views. This video has been seen by close to 900,000 people and other versions (they’ve ‘sliced and diced’ the original into a variety of styles and formats) have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times. These numbers don’t include  the  parody videos that are now starting to surface. That’s millions of views for an infomercial.

Vince Shlomi- the presenter who helped to make the owners of the ShamWow product a lot of money is back with another over-the-top delivery that heralds the glory of this new kitchen chopping device. It’s campy, it’s silly, and it’s exhausting but it does something that most other viral videos do not: it sells. It demonstrates the features and benefits of the product very clearly. And it is memorable.

The top commercial viral video at the moment is the Samsung Extreme Sheep LED Art video. (8 million views) It’s clever and fun to watch but has little, if any connection to the Samsung LED monitors it ‘promotes’. Most viral videos are really ‘sponsored entertainment’ with a very weak direct link to the product or service they are supposed to promote. Viral video producers are very careful to point out to advertisers that being to ‘salesy’ will turn viewers off (and also lessen their chances of winning awards).

The  T-mobile Dance video by contrast is absolutely brilliant and does what many viral videos do not – it includes the product and the experience (in this case – people sharing the moment with their camera-phones) as part of the video. Certainly the connection is not overt – but at least there is an obvious connection. Going from the hearding of  light-suit adorned sheep to large screen television screen is a bit more of a stretch.

Entertainment should never be the goal – if it is then you should sell tickets. Effectiveness should be the measure of success. Did your video sell product, inform your customers and prospects or ‘support the brand’ in a meaningful way?

Will Slap Chop win any awards?  No way. It will be ridiculed by ‘serious’ marketers.

Did it entertain?  If you are a big ‘kitchen demo rap’ fan – then it delivered the goods.

Did it help to raise awareness of the product?  Absolutely!

Was it memorable?  I won’t soon forget it.

Did it help to sell product? I don’t know the numbers but I would have to say yes – if for no other reason than all of the Slap Chop parody video creators having to rush out and buy the device to use in their parody videos. (Perhaps that is a new sub-market.)

Eight ideas to help get the most out of a man-on-the-street interview

winterlude-photo-session-image3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unscripted, authentic, natural, non-corporate – these are all terms used to describe a style of video that has become very popular. I imagine corporate/slick will expereince a rebirth in a few years – everything that is old is new, but for now real/authentic is de rigeur.

There are many ways that man-on-the-street video interviews are being used today: Guerrilla marketing, social marketing, public relations, promotional video, and market testing/sampling are all examples. Whatever the reason, here are eight ideas to help you get the most out of your effort:

1. Bring a sound guy (engineer). I see people holding cameras with little shotgun mikes mounted to the camera and wonder what type of sound quality they are getting. There is far too much ambient noise in an urban setting to get good clean sound from your interviewee. It’s too difficult for your cameraman to concentrate on the video portion of the shoot and the audio at the same time. Even if he notices a problem there is probably nothing he can do about it – he can’t move closer with the camera to get better sound. One option is getting the interviewee to hold a microphone – which works well but doesn’t look great  on camera. Another solution, if you have the time is to hook your interviewee up with a lavalier mike (the little microphone you click on to your shirt) – either wirelessly or with a wire, but that becomes too cumbersome if you are interviewing more than a few  people.

2. Getting people to go on camera - Suggestion #1: Use a woman to ask for on-camera volunteers. From experience I have the most luck when I work with a personable, professional women who is doing the interviewee rustling. It’s much easier for a woman to get a woman, or man, or family… or just about anyone on camera than it is for a man. Most people are terrified of being on camera. If you are aggressive, intimidating or overtly solicitous you’ll frighten people away.

3. Getting people to go on camera – Suggestion #2: Ask them to go in a group. People are much less intimidated by a camera if they are surrounded by friends, or strangers for that matter. Peer pressure will ensure that everyone eventually trundles up to the camera even if they don’t think they want to talk.

4. Have fun. Yep, this sounds trite but it’s really important. You’ll get a lot more out of people if you use a little humour to make them comfortable on camera and you will be much more likely to get onlookers to volunteer to go on camera if it looks like the process is fun. Even if the subject matter is serious it can still help to try to get people comfortable on camera before you start shooting.

5. Do a dry run. Tell the person that the camera isn’t rolling and get them to think through their answers. People are more comfortable if they can work through their answers first and it also give you a chance to coach them. An option is to keep the camera rolling even during the ‘dry run’. I’m always surprised when I get a great comment or reponse from an interviewee either just before or just after an interview when the camera isn’t rolling. Keep it rolling.

6. Play the odds. You want a good answer – you need to ask 10 questions. You want one good interviewee – you need to get 10 people in front of the camera. It’s a numbers game. Photographers shoot 10 shots to get one good one. The odds are much the same for man-on-the-street interviews. The more time you spend the greater the chance you have of getting that perfect interviewee. Higher numbers also help you hedge your bets during edit when you decide to change your approach.

7. Coach / Cajole / Convince. (‘The three C’s’ of the man-in-the-street interview.) Sure the purists will blanch at the  thought of “planned spontaneity” but it may save your shoot. If you know someone who is articulate and has something to say about whatever you happen to be filming- give them a call and have them wander by your shoot. If you are not getting what you want out of an interviewee be direct. I’m always surprised when someone says ‘oh that’s what you were looking for, why didn’t you just tell me’.  Of course at some point if the interviewee turns into an actor then you’ve probably lost your shot at authenticity.

8. Plan. This one sounds like motherhood too but it’s probably the most important. You have to know what outcomes you want before you start your interview. If you don’t know exactly what you are looking for then you shouldn’t be surprised when the stuff you get back is not usable. If you ask vague questions you will get vague answers.

9. Bonus idea- Wear pajamas under your clothes when shooting outside in the winter. {I’m not smoking in the above photo}

{Special nod to Stephen Fenn at Fenn Photography who took the above photo and helped out with the photographic requirements of this project)

Simple and direct is very effective.


Video ProductionWatch the top videos of the week here

Invisialign is a California based company that produces clear, removable teeth ‘aligners’. It’s two key points of differentiation with braces are that Invisalign’s product are easy to use and they are nearly invisible. The promotional video above highlights these two advantages in a very simple and very engaging manner. (Sure, having a presenter who looks and sounds like Demi Moore can’t hurt…).

This ad is very effective. It clearly and simply demonstrates the benefits of the product, it does so in a very engaging manner and it also tells a story which makes the presentation more real.

The production could not have been simpler – a close up of the presenter and a simple and direct call-to-action. There are a hundreds of different ways this promotion could have been created – many of them ‘award-winning’. Often simple and direct is the most effective route.

… and here is a Eurpoean promotion for Invisalign which likely cost a lot more to produce. Which one do you think is more effective?